Shahaf

Burning Man 2008

September 3, 2008 · 2 Comments

Last week I attended Burning Man with Pnina and her sister Miriam.  This was the first time at Burning Man for all of us.  It was a pretty amazing experience, difficult to summarize in a post, but here goes…

First off — look at the photos.  That’s the best way to get a feel for what goes on there:

The festival is held in Black Rock Desert in Nevada, about 100 miles north of Reno.  Incidentally the festival wasn’t always held there — it started on a beach in San Francisco in 1986, but by 1990 it grew too large and it had to relocate.  Also BTW it used to be a summer solstice festival so it was also relocated in time to the week before Labor Day.  There’s a pretty interesting Burning Man Timeline on the main BM website.

We drove Pnina’s little 4-door Mazda.  I’m still amazed we were able to pack everything into the car.  You really need to bring *everything* with you because there’s little available for purchase at the festival — only ice and coffee.  We brought 25 gallons of water, which took up about half the trunk.  Our tent, sleeping bags and sleeping mattresses consumed the other half.  And our clothes, food, booze, costumes, and other random stuff were tucked into the back seat and in every imaginable gap.  Also, we had three bikes hanging off the trunk.  The car has never seen so much weight before and its little 4-cylinder engine felt it — it was difficult to pass those slow-ass RV’s en route.

Incidentally, the drive to BM from Seattle was pretty nice.  We stopped at my parents place in Portland.  We also went through Crater Lake National Park and passed through a few other forests.  The view was pretty constant trees, mountains, and lakes…until we hit the desert.

The Burning Man festival keeps growing from year to year.  I don’t know how many people attended this year but it must be over 50,000 people.  Check out this photo of “Black Rock City” from above.  The city is arranged like a clock, with the man-to-burn in the middle, then a buffer zone of empty desert (“playa”), then concentric arcs of tents and campers reaching from 2 o’clock to 10 o’clock.  The temple (which also gets burned) is located at 12 o’clock.  And the whole space around the man, the temple, and beyond (north of 12 o’clock) is dotted with art installations.  Also, there are people walking, on bicycles, and on “art cars” (AKA mutant vehicles) pretty much everywhere.

We didn’t have a specific place to camp.  We showed up late on Tuesday so it was hard to see where we were anyhow.  We randomly ended up at 6:20 and Hummer (the arc roads had alphabetical names with the theme of cars).

The place you choose to camp is very important for several reasons.  First off, it’s your neighborhood — you’ll end up making friends with the people around you.  We got to know Ray and Dave, our immediate next-door neighbors, Casey and Carla, the next neighbors over.  More than that, we became close friends with Camp Burner Brown, which was a few doors down and had a much better setup than we did — RV’s, big shade structure, long table, BBQ, etc.  Also, your location determines how far you have to go to the porta potties, to center camp, and to the parties.  And it determines how easily you can sleep at night (if you choose to sleep that is) — you really can’t get away from the techno beat completely, but it gets louder as you approach 2 and 10 o’clock.

The hottest time of day is shortly before sunset (perhaps 100 degrees) and the coldest time of day is just before sunrise (not quite freezing but not that far).  It took us a day to realize that you need to arrange your daily schedule around that.  The first day there we spent a good 5-6 hours walking around the playa looking at the various art installations during the hottest part of day.  It really drained us.  Over the next few days we mostly chilled out at center camp during the hot hours, listening to random performers, meeting random people, learning how to knit (no joke), etc.  The best time to go around the playa is in the morning.  Unfortunately we never woke up early enough to enjoy that time because we were generally up pretty late partying (a couple of times till sunrise).  Also, around 8:30 AM our tent became stiflingly hot.  We kept playing this dance where the first person to notice the heat would wake up, remove the rain fly, and open all the windows, then go back to sleep.  Later, before leaving the tent, we would close all the windows and put the rain fly back up because you never really know when that big dust storm is going to hit.

Speaking of dust storms, there were two of them in Burning Man 2008.  The first one happened on Monday, and fortunately we missed it because we arrived Tuesday night.  We heard it was a total “white out”, and that entrance to the festival was halted for a good 5 hours.  The people stuck in line on the road must have thought it was pretty shitty, but at least they were in their cars — it was probably worse for the people stranded randomly somewhere in Black Rock City.  The second dust storm happened on Saturday, the day the man burns.  We experienced this one, and man what an experience.  The storm arrived around 1 PM and it didn’t let up until night-time.  We tried to take refuge in Center Camp, but there was really no way to get away from the dust.  Our hair was saturated and we looked like old folks.  At some point Pnina decided she had to use the rest rooms so we braved the winds outside and walked to the porta potties.  Then we went to our tent to have some dinner.  The wind was so strong that it put a continuous bulge in our tent (though the tent did stay up — thank you rebar!).  Also, I’m really not sure how this happened but even though we had all the windows closed and the rain fly up, we still got a 1/3 inch layer of dust in the tent — still blows my mind.

So the storms, the heat, and the cold — those are some of the harsh realities of life in Black Rock City.  Also, for us there were no real showers, just baby wipes.  But whatever.  It’s worth it for all the art, the parties, the performances, and the wonderful people we met.

To see the art you need to get around the playa, and the distances are huge — that’s one thing that definitely surprised me.  I don’t think the art pieces need to be quite that far apart so it must be a concious choice by the artist or by the BM organizers.  Perhaps the artist likes to see his audience make an effort to see his art; it’s not enough to drive all the way to Burning Man, you also need to hike way out into the desert.  Of the three bikes we brought, two broke down the first day.  We didn’t bother trying to fix them — it was too clumsy trying to ride and hold up an umbrella (for sun) at the same time, so we ditched our bikes at our camp and spent the week walking.  The great thing about walking is that you end up having more conversations with random people along the way.  The tough thing is that after a couple of days you’re exhausted.  So, one alternative is to hop on an art car — most of them are very cool about letting everyone come aboard.  On the other hand, you just don’t know where the art car is going to go.  We had a few situations where we hopped on an art car, hoping to see that one art installation way out in the desert, only to have that car turn around and take us further back towards camp.  Ugh!  :-)

The art pieces definitely take on a completely different character at night.  Or, at least, that’s true for the ones that involve either fire or neon lights or both.  But that’s most of them.

I mentioned before that other than ice and coffee, you can’t purchase anything at Burning Man.  People often hear that there’s a barter system at Burning Man – you bring stuff to trade with other people.  That’s not really true.  It’s actually a “gift” system, which is a pay-it-forward concept.  We brought extra chap stick (recommended by Matt Longest – thanks Matt!), extra ear plugs, some leftover booze from the wedding, and some random candy.  And we gave it to random people along the way.  We received booze, food, costumes, necklaces, belly dance lessons, knitting kits with yarn, and hugs – lots of people were big on hugs.

BTW, the candy we brought was occasionally difficult to give away — people were suspicious of what was in it (“it’s just jelly beans, I promise”).  Drugs were everywhere.  The first night we met this guy Darren at John Cougar Mellen-Camp.  He took three mushrooms and went on a huge trip, both figuratively and literally.  He ended up somewhere past the The End (which was the last art piece), and eventually he was picked up by the law enforcement people.

But what about the burn?  It took place Saturday night after the dust storm subsided.  *everyone* crowded around the playa and it was a complete party atmosphere (except for Pnina who by this point was so exhausted that she fell asleep waiting for the fire to start; which caused several people to stop by and ask “is she OK?”).  The burn started with fire works.  During the fire works, a few plumes of fire got the burning man tower going.  I don’t know how long it took — perhaps an hour or two — but eventually the whole burning man tower collapsed, and there was much rejoycing.  I’m told that at this point the crowd rushes in towards the ambers, but we were too far to see that.

The man-burn is not the only burn.  On Sunday night they burn the temple, and apparently that’s a quiet and spiritual affair.  But we were far too exhausted to stay another day.  We stayed up all night partying after the man-burn, then we packed up our stuff and headed out.

I’d say that the burn itself is pretty cool, but it’s not the main highlight for the week.  Lots of cool things happen all week long and each person at Black Rock City makes their own experience based on which art/camps/people they happen to meet.

Update (Sept 26)

We finally got around to posting Pnina’s photos.  Take a look – they’re really good (link above).

→ 2 CommentsCategories: Uncategorized

$1 Home in Detroit

August 15, 2008 · 1 Comment

From a random Skype chat at work…

[2:40:54 PM] Christopher Currie says: $1 homes in detroit: http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080813/METRO/808130360/&imw=Y

[2:44:15 PM] Thomas Young says: I especially like the sentence: The company hired to manage the home and sell it, the Bearing Group, boarded up the home only to find the boards stolen and used to board up another abandoned home nearby.

[2:47:59 PM] Aditya Acharya says: you could play monopoly with real property in detroit for about the same price as buying one of those nice monopoly boards

I also like this line: “The agent did say that the buyer agreed to pay the full list price of $1, and planned to pay cash.”

→ 1 CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Is Public Transit Energy Efficient?

July 31, 2008 · 1 Comment

Interesting article that argues that public transit is not energy efficient:

http://www.templetons.com/brad/transit-myth.html

It gives me the warm fuzzies to learn that our Yamaha Vino is actually far more energy efficient then any kind of public transit.

Here are the interesting parts…

How can this be?

A full bus or trainload of people is more efficient than private cars, sometimes quite a bit more so. But transit systems never consist of nothing but full vehicles. They run most of their day with light loads. The above calculations came from figures citing the average city bus holding 9 passengers, and the average train (light or heavy) holds 22. If that seems low, remember that every packed train at rush hour tends to mean a near empty train returning down the track.

Transit vehicles also tend to stop and start a lot, which eats a lot of energy, even with regenerative braking. And most transit vehicles are just plain heavy, and not very aerodynamic. Indeed, you’ll see tables in the DoE reports that show that over the past 30 years, private cars have gotten 30% more efficient, while buses have gotten 60% less efficient and trains about 25% worse. The market and government regulations have driven efforts to make cars more efficient, while transit vehicles have actually worsened.

In order to get people to ride transit, you must offer frequent service, all day long. They want to know they have the freedom to leave at different times. But that means emptier vehicles outside of rush hour. You’ve all seen those huge empty vehicles go by, you just haven’t thought of how anti-green they were. It would be better if off-hours transit was done by much smaller vehicles, but that implies too much capital cost — no transit agency will buy enough equipment for peak times and then buy a second set of equipment for light demand periods.

Transit planning is also driven by different economies. Often transit infrastructure (including vehicles) is paid for by state or federal money, while drivers (but also fuel) are paid from local city budgets. This seems to push local city transit agencies to get bigger vehicles and fewer drivers where they can, since drivers tend to be hired full-time and can’t be kept idling in low-demand periods.

“There is a bit of a paradox within these numbers. In spite of them, it is always the green move for any individual to take existing mass transit over their car. That’s because the transit is running anyway, so the incremental cost of carrying one more passenger is indeed less than just about any private vehicle. It is similarly green to carpool in somebody else’s car that’s going your way.

As such, these numbers should not make you feel better about taking your car instead of the train. Particularly solo, since solo drivers are what make the car’s average efficiency worse while carpoolers make it better”

Yes, you should still take transit

There is a bit of a paradox within these numbers. In spite of them, it is always the green move for any individual to take existing mass transit over their car. That’s because the transit is running anyway, so the incremental cost of carrying one more passenger is indeed less than just about any private vehicle. It is similarly green to carpool in somebody else’s car that’s going your way.

As such, these numbers should not make you feel better about taking your car instead of the train. Particularly solo, since solo drivers are what make the car’s average efficiency worse while carpoolers make it better.

These numbers instead are there to guide policy. What sort of transportation infrastructure should we build to be green? And, to a more limited extent, what sort of transportation should you support? The math should influence your decisions, and those of city planners who work for you, on what new transit to build, and what to keep running.

→ 1 CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Critical Mass Gone Wrong

July 31, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Pnina and I had dinner at Kabul the other night with a few of her friends from U of W.  One of them, Ryan McElroy, said that he participated in the Critical Mass ride on Friday, July 26, the one that went horribly wrong.

If you didn’t hear the story, here’s the brief summary.  The riders were going up Aloha Street on Capitol Hill. A couple of riders parked themselves in front of one car to keep it from trying to enter the lane until the rest of the riders went by — this is called “corking”.  The driver was running late to a dinner reservation so he was not amused.  There were some words exchanged between himself and the two cyclists (eventually a few more riders came along, including Ryan).  Then the driver did something stupid — he backed up the car and then drove it forward into the two cyclists.  One of them got out of the way, but the other wasn’t so lucky — the driver rolled over his leg (amazingly, no bones broken!).  Another rider jumped onto the hood of the car as it tried to get away (he used the roof-rack to hang on).  Then other riders came along and mob mentality set in — by the end, the car had four slashed tires, broken windows, and the driver was bleeding from his head.  By the time the police came around, Ryan says that the situation was pretty much defused.

The police report was very one-sided — it made it appear like the cyclists were responsible for inciting violence and the driver was simply acting in self defense.  Ryan tried to stick around and explain the real story, but the police (most of them) weren’t interested.  The first newspaper stories were based on the police report so they were similarly one-sided.

In response, Ryan wrote a blog post explaining what he witnessed.  His post got a lot of hits, was linked to, and eventually he started getting calls from local news: The Stranger, Seattle Times, The PI, Kiro 7 TV.  Then Q13 Fox called him up to do a story and he suggested meeting them at the site – at Aloha Street.  Q13 sent a cameraman but no interviewer, which he said made it difficult/awkward to do the interview.  No matter.  He walked the cameraman through the scene and told the story.  In the piece that aired, they ended up using only one of his quotes: “Yeah, I guess someone had a knife”.  After all the time he took to explained what happened, it was yet another completely one-sided story.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

When a part of your anatomy blows up…

July 31, 2008 · 1 Comment

Story taken from NPR…

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91943477

As a young woman, Betty Jenkins received a gift from her mother that was meant to attract the attention of young men. But as Jenkins, who is now 94, tells her niece, the attention she got wasn’t the kind she was expecting.

“I was very skinny, and I didn’t have any curves. I guess my mother got kind of worried, because she didn’t think I had enough boyfriends,” Jenkins said.

The gift was an inflatable bra that was designed to enhance its wearer’s figure. A straw-like tube was used to inflate pads in the cups.

“I was real excited, so I blew and blew to about [size] 32,” Jenkins said.

But things didn’t go smoothly during a plane trip in South America. The plane was flying near the Andes Mountains when Jenkins began to feel pressure and sensed there was a problem.

It turned out the cabin was not pressurized, and the bra was expanding.

“As the thing got bigger, I tried to stand up,” Jenkins said, “and I couldn’t see my feet.”

The instructions said that the bra’s pads could be inflated up to a size 48.

“I thought, ‘What would happen if it goes beyond 48?’” Jenkins recalled.

“I found out what happened,” she said. “It blew out.”

Only one of the cups burst, Jenkins said. But the noise was loud enough to seize the attention of everyone on the plane.

“The co-pilot came into the cabin with a gun, wondering what had happened. The men all pointed to me.”

Jenkins then tried to explain in Spanish what she could hardly explain in English, “that part of your anatomy just blew up.”

The plane made an emergency landing, and Jenkins was handed over to the police. She was ordered to strip, as the officers looked for what they assumed could only be a bomb.

After she showed the officers the hole in her bra, Jenkins was allowed back on the plane and her trip continued.

“A month later, I got a bill from the airline for $400,” Jenkins said, “for an unscheduled stop.”

Her mother enjoyed the story so much that she kept the broken bra. Her mother died in 1967. As for the bra, Jenkins says she no longer has it.

Produced for Morning Edition by Nadia Reiman. The senior producer for StoryCorps is Michael Garofalo.

→ 1 CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Misused Quotation Marks

May 17, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Misused quotation marks crack me up.

Apparently there are whole galleries of this stuff: http://www.juvalamu.com/qmarks/

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Where Does the Money Go?

April 21, 2008 · 1 Comment

I recently read a book called Where Does the Money Go? by Scott Bittle and Jean Johnson. The book talks about the US budget — the different sources of revenue and the various expenditures. And the main message of the book is that we need to do something about the huge and growing US debt.

The book appears to be sincerely non-partisan. It offers a lot of suggestions for what can be done, some that are more right-wing, some more left-wing, and it leaves it up to the reader to decide which way to go.

The book has a Dummies-like sense of humor that sometimes works and sometimes falls flat. It also tends to repeat itself a lot. But in between the fluff there’s a bunch of useful information, some of which really surprised me.

Here’s my quick summary…

THE DEFICIT AND THE DEBT

For 31 out of the last 35 years, the US has run a deficit. The four outstanding years were 1998-2001, at the tail end of the .com bubble (and Clinton presidency) and just prior to 9/11.

The total debt is now roughly $9 trillion dollars. That’s $30,000 for every US citizen.

There’s a clock in Manhattan that counts the national debt. It will need to be upgraded as soon as the national debt reaches $10 trillion because it doesn’t have enough digits to count that high.

To give you an idea of how big these numbers are, consider that if you added the fortunes of the 10 richest people in America (Gates, Buffet, Adelson, Ellison, Allen, the Waltons, and Dell) it would still be less than the Us government’s deficit for the 2006 tax year alone ($248 billion).

SO WHAT?

There’s one view that says that this debt is not that bad. How so? Well, the debt ($9 trillion) is roughly 3.5 times the US government’s annual tax revenue ($2.4 trillion). That’s kind of like a person who makes $50,000 a year having a mortgage on his house for which he still owes $175,000. That doesn’t sound so bad, right? Well, the difference is that people with mortgages follow a very specific plan to pay them off. The government has no such plan, and the accountability mechanisms are far more fuzzy.

If I were to stop paying my mortgage, eventually the bank would reposes my house. Also, my credit rating would be shot, which means that I would have a hard time taking out any kind of loan in the future. What if the US government were to fail to pay its debt? What exactly is there to reposes? And who would do the reposessing?

Of course, there wouldn’t be any kind of reposessing. The government has the nice luxury that it can always deal with its debt by raising taxes (whereas I’m less likely to be successful if I were to turn to my boss and say “you’re going to have to pay me more this year”). The government can also choose to spend less on various things (defense, roads, social security) in order to pay back its debt. All of these alternatives come at a cost to you and I — either we pay more or we get less.

But for now the government hasn’t had to resort to these measures because it has an easy enough time just borrowing more and more money to keep up with its growing expenditures. The trick is that at some point the lenders might decide that the US government is maybe not the same old safe investment vehicle it used to be. If they choose to invest their money elsewhere, the government will either have to entice them back with higher interest rates or simply go without the loans.

More than $2 trillion of the US debt is owed to foreign banks and other international investors. Biggest on the list…not China! It’s actually Japan, at $612 billion. But China is in 2nd place at $420 billion. Then come the UK, various Oil exporters, various Caribbean banking centers, Brazil, Luxembourg, Hong Kong, Korea, and Taiwan. What if you lumped China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan into one group? It would still be second place, but it would be much closer. Also, debt to China is growing faster.

China is in an interesting position. As long as wages in China are so low, they can afford to manufacture goods at a low cost. Consumers in the US are happy to buy these goods as long as the US economy is doing well enough (as long as people have jobs). So, to some degree it’s in China’s best interest to do what’s necessary to keep the US economy healthy, which includes lending the US money.

GOVERNMENT REVENUE

The government collects about $2.5 trillion each year. The majority of the government’s revenue comes from taxes you and I pay:

Some money always goes uncollected — some people don’t pay their taxes. It’s hard to know exactly how much this is, but one rough estimate is $250 billion (10%).

Part of the reason some people get away with not paying all the taxes they owe is that the tax code is huge and horribly complex. We have a progressive tax system, where richer people pay a higher rate. This kind of system is always going to be more complex than some alternatives because you need to keep track of how much each person is making. Our tax code is even more complex because we use it as a tool for social policy — we give tax credits to things that we think are good. For example, I get a nice tax credit on the interest I pay on my home mortgage because as a society we’ve decided that owning a home is a good thing.

The amount of taxes paid by the super-rich has fluctuated with the coming and going of various administrations. This graph shows the percent paid in taxes for every dollar you make beyond the first $200,000 in a given year:

I was pretty surprised to see what a big change Ronald Reagan made, and now I understand why it was such a big deal when Bush Sr promised no new taxes and then renigged.

Social security is considered a regressive tax — you only pay this tax for the first $94,000 (or so) you make in a given year. That means that lower-income people pay social security for every dollar they earn, while rich people only pay it for a small portion of their overall income.

How does our tax rate compare to other countries? It’s relatively low…

GOVERNMENT SPENDING

The majority of the government’s spending goes towards five things: social security, defense, medicare, medicaid, and paying off interest on loans the government took previously.

Lots of other programs you typically think of as government spending don’t really account for very much:
* Science, space, technology (including NASA, NSF, etc.): $23.6 billion (less than 1%)
* Arts & humanities: $124 million (0.009%)
* Foreign aid & international relations: $29.5 billion (1.1%)
* Food stamps and other welfare: $70.9 billion (2.7%)
etc.

And although we all like to criticize pork-barrel spending (and I do sincerely hope we cut it as much as possible), the truth is that it also doesn’t account for very much, relatively speaking. The Pig Book from the Citizens Against Government Waste says that in 2006 there were nearly 10,000 pork projects that totaled $29 billion — about 1%.

What if the war in Iraq never happened? It would help, but not nearly enough. Through mid-2007 the country spent $400 billion on the war. During the same time, we added $2.3 trillion to the debt.

WHAT TO DO?

Bush Jr instituted a bunch of different tax cuts, and most of them are set to expire in 2010 (some a little sooner). If we let them all expire, it would bring the US budget to a surplus by 2012. However…there are issues. First off, this would be a temporary fix at best because the problems with social security and medicare/aid continue to grow (more on that below). Second, not all of these tax cuts are likely to be repealed. Much to my surprise, they are not all tax cuts for the rich. For example, there’s a child tax credit that democrats are likely to want to renew. Expect a big fight in Washington as 2010 closes in.

The areas of biggest concern in the US budget are social security, medicare, and medicaid. Why? Because: 1. they’re already big, and 2. they’re growing faster than any other part of the budget.

Social security is a pay-as-you-go program, which means that taxes I’m paying today are used to pay people who are retired today (the money I pay is not held in my name). The trouble is that the baby boomers are retiring now, which means that a huge part of the population is going from paying money into the system to pulling money out of the system. The workforce is shrinking, which means that the taxes collected are also shrinking. As a result, the government needs to borrow more and more to cover the social security checks it needs to write.

So one thing we could possibly do is cut social security payments. Apparently it’s political suicide for anyone who walks this road, but there are a few ideas that sound reasonable to me: cut payments for ultra-rich retirees (they don’t need it anyways), raise the retirement age to match growing life expectency, etc. Whatever we do, we have to be careful about it because sometimes in the last 30 years Americans stopped saving money for retirement…

I’m not saying this is a good thing. I think it’s totally irresponsible of all these people to not save up for retirement. But if we suddenly cut their social security payments, it would be a huge mess.

Medicare and Medicaid have their own issues, namely that prices for medical care are growing faster than any other costs. There are various suggestions on what we can do to try to lower medical costs, and I won’t go into them here (too much detail to mention). One thing to note is that there is general agreement that Veterans Affairs has been run in a very efficient manner, so perhaps Medicare/Medicaid can steal a page from its book.

AS ELECTIONS CLOSE IN

Part of the issue is that politicians have every incentive to promise new spending and no incentive at all to talk about raising taxes, cutting programs, or balancing the budget. About the only kind of tax raising that is safe enough to talk about (for democrats) is taxes on the rich, but that’s partly because 90% of us consider ourselves to be middle class :)

In New Zealand, just prior to elections, the government has to report on how campaign promises will affect the budget. It would be great if we had that system, but we don’t. For now, we should all educate ourselves on what kind of spending each candidate has in mind and what it might do for the budget. There are a few websites listed below to help us out.

REFERENCE

Websites and other resources suggested by the book:
www.publicagenda.com – the authors work for this organization
www.concordcoalition.com – information on the “Fiscal Wake-Up Tour”
www.nifi.org – they publish guides, each of which focuses on some public issue and offers 3-4 alternative policies; one of these guides talks about the national debt
www.vote411.org – get yourself registered to vote!
www.taxreformpanel.gov – a short-lived government panel that tried to devise a simpler tax code
www.FairTax.org – group that wants to replace income tax with a national sales tax
www.clubforgrowth.org – group that wants to repeal the estate tax
www.responsiblewealth.org – group that opposes the repeal
www.wyden.senate.gov – Senator Wyden has an idea for a simpler tax code that has just 3 tax brackets and fewer deductions
www.cagw.org – they release an annual book on pork spending (The Pig Book)
www.transparency.org – they rate countries on corruption (in 2006 Haiti was #1, with Guinea, Iraq, and Myanmar close behind; Finland, Iceland, and New Zealand were most honest)
www.expectmore.gov – where the Office of Management and Budget posts its ratings of how well government agencies function
EMILY’s list – funds promising women political candidates
Cook Political Report – forecasts how much of a battle to expect for different seats in congress
www.FactCheck.org – keeps tabs on the tall tales candidates tell when they’re running for office
CQMoneyLine – a website focusing on lobbying
www.taxpayer.net/awards/goldenfleece – Another pork spending website; former Senator William Proxmire from Wisconsin started the Golden Fleece Awards given to congressmen for high achievements in fleecing the taxpayer
www.vote-smart.org – information on candidates running for office
www.opensecrets.org – find out who’s backing various political candidates
www.maplight.org – ties legislation to the people and groups who backed it

→ 1 CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Jott

March 3, 2008 · Leave a Comment

www.jott.com

This service lets you call a number and dictate some notes. You can then have them sent to yourself as an email. There are also options to send to other people.

I tried Jotting myself this note: Remind Pnina to pick up kitty litter from the supermarket.

End result: Remind Meena(?) to pick up City Letter from the supermarket.

I can understand that Jott’s voice recognition software is helpless with a name like Pnina, but what’s a City Letter? And why is it capitalized? Also, there was a significant delay between when I made the call and when the email was delivered (i.e. there was no use to sitting there hitting Refresh in my gmail box).

Anyhow, the service basically works and it’s free. I’ll probably keep using it for reminders.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Food Fight

February 29, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Various wars from history, as fought by the foods of those countries:

http://www.boingboing.net/2008/02/28/history-of-war-throu.html

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

When I die I want to be a diamond

February 26, 2008 · Leave a Comment

http://www.lifegem.com/

For a fee, this company will make a diamond from the carbon in the ashes of your cremated relative.

Pnina learned about this from her recent Physical Chemistry problem set — her professor finds the most random references.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized